altruism
发表于 2025-3-26 23:24:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6223/622275/622275_31.png
BILK
发表于 2025-3-27 04:56:01
s what management theory and practice looked like in the first century, uses this as a lens to examine what the Gospel of Luke says about management, and draws out implications for today. However, the book is quite profound in finding that management is a dominant theme in the Gospel, that its messa
粗糙
发表于 2025-3-27 09:03:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6223/622275/622275_33.png
CLAM
发表于 2025-3-27 13:19:34
Book 2013istently counter-cultural, and that Luke contains a four-phase ‘how to‘ process model to help readers to implement change. Readers will acquire a new way to understand the Gospel as well as the moral foundations of modern management.
没有贫穷
发表于 2025-3-27 17:17:42
ge is consistently counter-cultural, and that Luke contains a four-phase ‘how to‘ process model to help readers to implement change. Readers will acquire a new way to understand the Gospel as well as the moral foundations of modern management.978-1-137-37733-3978-1-137-31586-1
MENT
发表于 2025-3-27 18:31:19
Overview of this Bookat its message is consistently countercultural, and that Luke contains a four-phase process model to help readers implement change. The book presents a new way to understand the Gospel and the moral foundations of modern management.
ELUDE
发表于 2025-3-28 02:01:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6223/622275/622275_37.png
Flounder
发表于 2025-3-28 03:23:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6223/622275/622275_38.png
esoteric
发表于 2025-3-28 08:19:06
Passages about Managing Relationships , Organizations (,), we will examine Luke’s descriptions of its three key dimensions: husband-wife relationships, parent-child relationships, and master-slave relationships. Taken together, these passages in Luke consistently critique traditional first-century organizational structures and systems, and point to alternative ways of doing .
宽容
发表于 2025-3-28 12:23:42
Passages about Managing Relationships , Organizationsclients who were subservient to the patron, was dominant. However, the older Greek understanding of benefaction as giving resources for the good of the larger community without expecting anything in return had not been forgotten (e.g., Seneca)..