ARIA
发表于 2025-3-26 22:57:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6205/620409/620409_31.png
synchronous
发表于 2025-3-27 02:49:48
Ahmad A. Aziz El-Banna,Kaishun Wuccount the notion of passivity in Leibniz‘s philosophy, commIn the present book, Pauline Phemister argues against traditional Anglo-American interpretations of Leibniz as an idealist who conceives ultimate reality as a plurality of mind-like immaterial beings and for whom physical bodies are ultimat
vasospasm
发表于 2025-3-27 09:01:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6205/620409/620409_33.png
arrhythmic
发表于 2025-3-27 11:17:23
Ahmad A. Aziz El-Banna,Kaishun Wuaris (1672–1676). I present the problem of incompossibility against Leibniz’s attempt to amend the Cartesian proof of God’s existence. Leibniz argues that the notion of the most perfect being must be shown to be possible. Leibniz’s reasoning is this: if the most perfect being could be shown to be po
前面
发表于 2025-3-27 15:51:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6205/620409/620409_35.png
Maximizer
发表于 2025-3-27 20:01:05
Ahmad A. Aziz El-Banna,Kaishun Wuone can achieve by placing Leibniz‘s philosophy in the context of the sources for two of the most basic concerns of his philosophical career: his metaphysics of individuals and the principle oftheir individuation. In this book I provide for the first time a detailed examination of these two Leibnizi