发生
发表于 2025-3-23 10:24:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5893/589237/589237_11.png
围巾
发表于 2025-3-23 15:36:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5893/589237/589237_12.png
adulterant
发表于 2025-3-23 19:49:11
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230006027Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; Hegel; Immanuel Kant; knowledge; Martin Heidegger; ontology; philosophy; Pla
能量守恒
发表于 2025-3-24 00:01:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5893/589237/589237_14.png
溺爱
发表于 2025-3-24 03:06:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5893/589237/589237_15.png
PATHY
发表于 2025-3-24 08:31:03
A Sophistical Differenduch an argument? In the first place it can be seen to challenge the assumption that . can be viewed as presenting Lyotard principal . idea – the idea of the differend, for my argument suggests that that idea is not solely ., but also sophistical.
blackout
发表于 2025-3-24 11:25:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5893/589237/589237_17.png
噱头
发表于 2025-3-24 15:42:20
ss establishes their fundamental identity. In the second section, the book shows the radicality of Lyotard‘s analyzes in contrast to such traditional views. It examines Lyotard‘s complex and original readings of sophistical arguments, and offers a new interpretation of The Differend .978-1-349-51103-7978-0-230-00602-7
俗艳
发表于 2025-3-24 22:13:17
Lyotard and the Sophistication of Ontologyarks made by Lyotard in that text. Under the heading ‘Author’ Lyotard declares that ‘the present reflections’ were announced ‘in the .’ of . (1977) and in the Introduction to . (1979). Were he not afraid of being tedious, he would confess that he had begun this work right after the publication of . (1974).
ferment
发表于 2025-3-25 03:08:27
Conclusionnforms The Differend. It has not been my intention to suggest that this was the only influence on The Differend, but to evaluate the role that it could be said to play and the importance of that role.