欢笑
发表于 2025-3-23 13:22:13
,Britain, the United States and the Reform of NATO Strategy, 1964–1966,clear arms control measures were dim, and NATO Europe remained concerned that nuclear war could be initiated by the superpowers, with European governments marginalised both in the decision-making process and in the control of the physical hardware. These were issues to which the Labour government of Harold Wilson had immediately to address itself.
机构
发表于 2025-3-23 15:32:56
Nuclear Weapons and International Security since 1945http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/588657.jpg
微尘
发表于 2025-3-23 18:04:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5887/588657/588657_13.png
mitten
发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:59
Book 2012This book sheds fresh light on developments in British nuclear weapons policy between October 1964, when the Labour Party came back into power under Harold Wilson following a thirteen year absence, and June 1970 when the Conservative government of Edward Heath was elected.
灾难
发表于 2025-3-24 03:06:55
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369252government; NATO; Policy; reform; British Politics
使闭塞
发表于 2025-3-24 09:04:36
978-1-349-33656-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012
CLAMP
发表于 2025-3-24 10:43:01
Losing an Empire and Finding a Role978-0-230-36925-2Series ISSN 2947-6704 Series E-ISSN 2947-6712
Geyser
发表于 2025-3-24 15:02:56
Introduction, Power status lingered on’ as the winds of change heralded by Prime Minster Harold Macmillan blew the British Empire into the informal Commonwealth federation.. While it is true that Britain was losing its empire, it will be argued that it was reorienting its role in the world that prioritised Europ
RECUR
发表于 2025-3-24 21:02:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5887/588657/588657_19.png
全面
发表于 2025-3-24 23:48:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5887/588657/588657_20.png