渗入 发表于 2025-3-28 17:22:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_41.png

META 发表于 2025-3-28 22:00:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_42.png

BRAWL 发表于 2025-3-28 23:45:17

Peter Barth chapter. I attempt to improve the standard account of knowledge-wh by introducing an inquiry-based approach to knowledge of this sort. I defend a view according to which knowing-wh is the outcome of (successful) inquiries into certain wh-questions. Thus knowing where Buenos Aires is is the outcome

冒烟 发表于 2025-3-29 05:11:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_44.png

思考而得 发表于 2025-3-29 08:17:41

Peter Barthn know what H.O is without having the word “H.O” is one’s vocabulary. I also deal with an objection according to which the erotetic view is excessively intellectualist. I argue that it is not, for it allows subjects to have knowledge of this sort without knowledge of any description of the thing in

Catheter 发表于 2025-3-29 15:29:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_46.png
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Logic-Based 0–1 Constraint Programming; Peter Barth Book 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996 Natural.Programming language A.constraint.co