渗入 发表于 2025-3-28 17:22:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_41.pngMETA 发表于 2025-3-28 22:00:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_42.pngBRAWL 发表于 2025-3-28 23:45:17
Peter Barth chapter. I attempt to improve the standard account of knowledge-wh by introducing an inquiry-based approach to knowledge of this sort. I defend a view according to which knowing-wh is the outcome of (successful) inquiries into certain wh-questions. Thus knowing where Buenos Aires is is the outcome冒烟 发表于 2025-3-29 05:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_44.png思考而得 发表于 2025-3-29 08:17:41
Peter Barthn know what H.O is without having the word “H.O” is one’s vocabulary. I also deal with an objection according to which the erotetic view is excessively intellectualist. I argue that it is not, for it allows subjects to have knowledge of this sort without knowledge of any description of the thing inCatheter 发表于 2025-3-29 15:29:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588089/588089_46.png