PHAG 发表于 2025-3-23 10:30:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_11.png口音在加重 发表于 2025-3-23 14:35:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_12.pngPerennial长期的 发表于 2025-3-23 21:59:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_13.pngButtress 发表于 2025-3-23 22:34:02
Introduction,logic in any serious sense of the term. . is an exposition of Russell’s initial vision of logicism, which he formulated as a result of reflecting on the arithmetization of analysis and geometry — ‘modern mathematics’ as he used to call it — and the methodological consequences of the new logic.态度暖昧 发表于 2025-3-24 03:37:46
Russell on Kant and the Synthetic a priori,r, helps us to see that there is more to it than just a rather simplistic misreading of Kant. Ultimately, what is at stake here is the contrast between two radically different perspectives on the synthetic .: epistemic (Kant) and metaphysical (Russell).indenture 发表于 2025-3-24 06:52:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_16.pngRACE 发表于 2025-3-24 13:01:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_17.png使乳化 发表于 2025-3-24 15:57:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_18.png是限制 发表于 2025-3-24 21:17:42
Russell and the Bolzanian Conception of Logic,rgument, it will be recalled, was directed against Kant’s model of explanation, which seeks to derive a number of properties of . propositions from features characterizing the cognition of these propositions; this was referred to as the relativized model of the . (r-model). Russell’s own view is tha后退 发表于 2025-3-25 01:12:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/588000/588000_20.png