换话题
发表于 2025-3-26 23:17:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_31.png
昆虫
发表于 2025-3-27 02:05:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_32.png
Extort
发表于 2025-3-27 09:22:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_33.png
合并
发表于 2025-3-27 12:23:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_34.png
老巫婆
发表于 2025-3-27 13:35:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_35.png
ETHER
发表于 2025-3-27 17:46:01
,Truths about Simpson’s Paradox: Saving the Paradox from Falsity,d when confronted with SP? An adequate analysis of the paradox starts by distinguishing these three questions. Then, by developing a formal account of SP, and substantiating it with a counter-example to causal accounts, we argue that there are no causal factors at play in answering questions (i) and
松驰
发表于 2025-3-28 00:06:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_37.png
歹徒
发表于 2025-3-28 05:53:37
Hierarchies in Inclusion Logic with Lax Semantics,the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion atoms in formulae. In case of universal quantifiers, the corresponding hierarchy collapses at the first level. Arity hierarchy is shown to be strict by relating the question to the study of arity hierarchies in fixed-point logics.
等级的上升
发表于 2025-3-28 08:48:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587970/587970_39.png
条街道往前推
发表于 2025-3-28 12:46:10
A Pragmatistic Approach to Propositional Knowledge Based on the Successful Behavior of Belief,ief through time. In this article we propose the idea that the belief can be said to be successful in relation to any of these respects. We will call them, respectively, the first, second, and third person perspective on knowledge and investigate the requisite properties of these three perspectives.