collagenase 发表于 2025-3-26 23:27:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_31.png发芽 发表于 2025-3-27 05:02:12
eive the constitution of a polity. (ii) The second is what we mean by judicial reasoning, that is, how we believe judges could and should reason in arriving at their decisions. (iii) And the third one is the more philosophical view of what law‘s nature is. We will get different results, we will asse简洁 发表于 2025-3-27 06:20:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_33.png防水 发表于 2025-3-27 12:20:49
Dieter Schlenstedteive the constitution of a polity. (ii) The second is what we mean by judicial reasoning, that is, how we believe judges could and should reason in arriving at their decisions. (iii) And the third one is the more philosophical view of what law‘s nature is. We will get different results, we will assePresbycusis 发表于 2025-3-27 14:54:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_35.png芦笋 发表于 2025-3-27 21:02:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_36.pngcrockery 发表于 2025-3-28 00:02:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_37.png礼节 发表于 2025-3-28 04:58:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_38.pngInoperable 发表于 2025-3-28 08:51:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587187/587187_39.pngosteopath 发表于 2025-3-28 11:00:15
Birgit Dahlkepart of the national legal system, and that international law is qualified by supremacy over national laws and by direct effect on all matters regulated differently by national laws. However, from other operative provisions of the Constitution (powers of the Ombudsman, grounds for adjudication and f