FILTH
发表于 2025-3-23 11:44:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_11.png
使痛苦
发表于 2025-3-23 15:56:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_12.png
Expediency
发表于 2025-3-23 21:08:12
Ontological Gap in the Neo-Pragmatism,ect. .)), we will see how the lack of ontological questioning results in under-explaining the . of normativity in Brandom’s account, inflation of truth and relativistic implications in Rorty’s work and an inability to deal with non-cognitive practices in Habermas.
indubitable
发表于 2025-3-24 00:33:48
Pragmatism of Existential Ontology, .) and strong and weak aspects of the current pragmatic interpretations of Heidegger’s work proposed most notably by Dreyfus and other philosophers such as Okrent, Wrathall, Haugeland and others (Sect. .).
ARENA
发表于 2025-3-24 02:32:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_15.png
来自于
发表于 2025-3-24 06:43:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_16.png
Mindfulness
发表于 2025-3-24 13:07:17
Phenomenology and the Primacy of Practice Thesis (II),, maximizing our ability-to-be) goes hand in hand with the foreclosure of non-interactive possibilities. By polemicizing with both early and later Heidegger, we will arrive at a pragmatic notion of foreclosure that presupposes constant dynamics between the opening up and the closing off of practical fields.
instate
发表于 2025-3-24 15:53:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_18.png
flex336
发表于 2025-3-24 21:07:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_19.png
拥护
发表于 2025-3-25 01:38:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5860/585904/585904_20.png