Limpid 发表于 2025-3-30 08:36:41
Life in Action: Nutritive Souls in Aristotle usefully compared to evolution by natural selection. The physiological account, invoking vital heat, does not fit well with modern science. Nor do the concepts of form necessary to animal and rational souls.tympanometry 发表于 2025-3-30 12:44:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5858/585777/585777_52.pnganniversary 发表于 2025-3-30 19:19:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5858/585777/585777_53.pngFactorable 发表于 2025-3-30 23:21:13
Ghosts in the Machine: Vitalismly been rejected and labelled “vitalist” because their position do not fit with current ideas of mechanism, but many were important to the later development of biology. A critical distinction hangs on how we use the term “nature.”