Galactogogue
发表于 2025-3-23 11:12:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585591/585591_11.png
Costume
发表于 2025-3-23 17:50:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585591/585591_12.png
urethritis
发表于 2025-3-23 21:59:09
Antonio Nicita,Filippo Bellocties across multiple industries.Features a mix of internatioThis book addresses the increased fragmentation and internationalization of production. It explores how concurrent business transformations in manufacturing and marketing impact global and developing economies, and how supply chain initiati
防锈
发表于 2025-3-24 00:12:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585591/585591_14.png
meditation
发表于 2025-3-24 02:58:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585591/585591_15.png
Noctambulant
发表于 2025-3-24 10:33:25
The Liberalization of Network Industries: Meaning and Purpose,l monopoly and originally controlled by public ownership. We briefly recall the main features of alternative market forms (perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly) as distinct from those characterizing natural monopoly through decreasing average costs over the range of
碎片
发表于 2025-3-24 13:38:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585591/585591_17.png
BRACE
发表于 2025-3-24 18:04:36
Liberalization, Antitrust, and Pro-Consumer Policies,the analysis will be devoted in particular to the so-called essential facility doctrine and to the enforcement of antitrust law against margin squeeze abuses of a dominant position. Recent cases have raised the question of how to define the proper boundary between regulation and competition policy i
震惊
发表于 2025-3-24 21:18:04
Liberalization Patterns: The Case of Electronic Communications, and international debates about industrial policy in Europe in the last decades. With reference to the telecommunications market, we discuss the role of institutional complementarities and show that the removal of entry barriers to market before the establishment of a regulatory authority has reduc
季雨
发表于 2025-3-25 01:40:32
Political Market Design in Network Industries,dated data on market liberalizations and analyze countries’ aggregate trends and sectoral patterns. In particular, we explore such heterogeneity in market liberalization patterns and analyze the role played by government ideology. We show that right-wing governments pushed for privatization policies