heirloom 发表于 2025-3-23 10:33:53
Autonomy-Based Liberalism and State Support for Art: An Antiperfectionist Justificationfficient range of valuable options for all citizens, state support for these options should not be a general rule, but it should rather be the exception. Furthermore, it will be argued that support is only legitimate and reconcilable with autonomy-based liberalism when certain criteria have been met.规章 发表于 2025-3-23 14:57:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585561/585561_12.pngDebrief 发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585561/585561_13.png薄膜 发表于 2025-3-23 23:20:49
Liberalism and Neutrality: A Philosophical Examinationshould apply it? After a clarification of different kinds of neutrality (neutrality of justification, neutrality of aim, neutrality of effects, neutrality of opportunity and compensatory neutrality), it will be argued that neutrality of justification or neutrality of aim is the most plausible concepNefarious 发表于 2025-3-24 03:23:10
Comprehensive and Political Antiperfectionismautonomy as a comprehensive doctrine, in . he tries to avoid this. However, even the later Rawls is unable to avoid a mild form of comprehensive or autonomy-based liberalism. It seems impossible (but also not necessary) to give a neutral justification for a neutral (antiperfectionist) state policy.dictator 发表于 2025-3-24 07:08:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585561/585561_16.pngmonologue 发表于 2025-3-24 12:16:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585561/585561_17.png抛射物 发表于 2025-3-24 15:36:04
John Rawls: Liberal Neutrality and Subsidizing Artnly legitimate if there is a unanimous consensus about the value of art and about state support. However, taking into account reasonable pluralism, this consensus is an impossible aim and this is why Rawls’s argumentation is not fully convincing. In addition, he uses the concept of public goods in t后来 发表于 2025-3-24 21:54:11
Autonomy-Based Liberalism and State Support for Art: An Antiperfectionist Justificationgoods) is proposed: if subsidizing perfectionist goods facilitates the amount of valuable options to choose from and leads to more equality at the level of making autonomous choices (equality of autonomy), then state support can be allowed. However, given the fact that there is no consensus among ciSPALL 发表于 2025-3-25 00:22:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5856/585561/585561_20.png