Hallmark 发表于 2025-3-23 12:33:07
Leibniz on the Logic of Conceptual Containment and Coincidence,from the mid-1680s, however, his focus shifts away from the logic of containment to that of coincidence, or mutual containment. This shift in emphasis is indicative of the fact that Leibniz’s logic has its roots in two distinct theoretical frameworks: (i) the traditional theory of the categorical syFriction 发表于 2025-3-23 15:46:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_12.pngConsequence 发表于 2025-3-23 21:58:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_13.png违抗 发表于 2025-3-24 00:13:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_14.png正式通知 发表于 2025-3-24 06:01:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_15.pngToxoid-Vaccines 发表于 2025-3-24 07:07:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_16.png交响乐 发表于 2025-3-24 11:22:01
Leibniz and the Calculus of Variations, Bernoulli and by Newton and Leibniz were all different and highly original. Leibniz’ solution has received less attention than those of the Bernoullis, but I show here that his abstract idea was also general and powerful enough for a general theory, although the history of mathematics took a differ精确 发表于 2025-3-24 17:30:25
,Teleology and Realism in Leibniz’s Philosophy of Science,nterpretation of physical theories. Granting that Leibniz’s fundamental ontology remains non-physical, or mentalistic, it argues that teleological principles nevertheless ground a realist commitment about mechanical descriptions of phenomena. The empirical results of the new sciences, according to LJAMB 发表于 2025-3-24 20:17:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_19.png江湖骗子 发表于 2025-3-25 01:56:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5846/584523/584523_20.png