取之不竭 发表于 2025-3-26 21:02:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_31.pngconfiguration 发表于 2025-3-27 02:27:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_32.png流浪者 发表于 2025-3-27 09:10:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_33.pngInfraction 发表于 2025-3-27 09:56:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_34.pngInnocence 发表于 2025-3-27 15:26:01
The Parliamentary Debates,f ‘in principle’ arguments. To conclude, we draw on stakeholder accounts to explore responses to the vote, in which members of each cluster reflect on their personal and professional labour in securing—or contesting—the result.Granular 发表于 2025-3-27 19:44:16
Enacting Ethical Futures, the operation of power. We reflect upon the relationship between mitochondrial donation and the next invocation, and potential iteration, of this imaginary: contestation about Crispr/Cas9 gene editing. We close by articulating how the legalisation of mitochondrial donation is the enactment of an ethical future.Inelasticity 发表于 2025-3-28 00:37:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_37.pngOsteoarthritis 发表于 2025-3-28 05:45:49
http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/583797.jpg似少年 发表于 2025-3-28 08:55:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583797/583797_39.pngAbbreviate 发表于 2025-3-28 13:28:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74645-6reproductive technology; genetic technology; biopolitics; socio-legal studies; Mitochondrial donation; Sc