支柱 发表于 2025-3-26 23:51:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_31.pngFeedback 发表于 2025-3-27 04:58:22
Kevelson’s Semiotics Todayal, (b) whether there are parallel processes in other fields of professional signification, and (c) how the social field comes to accept those signs in their legal sense and evolves in accordance with the legal meanings of them.宣称 发表于 2025-3-27 06:13:46
Book 2018931-1998). It highlights the importance of her ideas and works which have contributed to legal theory, legal interpretation and philosophy of language. ..Kevelson’s work is particularly relevant today, in our world of global electronic communication networks which rely so much on language, signs, si步兵 发表于 2025-3-27 12:19:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_34.png挑剔为人 发表于 2025-3-27 14:25:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_35.pngObsequious 发表于 2025-3-27 21:29:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_36.png躺下残杀 发表于 2025-3-28 00:52:50
Jan M. Broekman,Frank FleerackersPresents new approaches to the conception of semiotics in legal and political theory.Reviews the sign-character of law and its relation to the individual and the state.Evaluates hermeneutics in legal加花粗鄙人 发表于 2025-3-28 05:55:37
SpringerBriefs in Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/583769.jpg苦恼 发表于 2025-3-28 09:44:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_39.pngGRAZE 发表于 2025-3-28 11:06:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583769/583769_40.png