伙伴
发表于 2025-3-28 15:32:43
About the Impossibility of Absolute State Sovereignty. The Modern Era and the Early Legal Positivistolute or unlimited sovereignty is impossible because all sovereignty is necessarily underpinned by its conditions of possibility. The present chapter consists of two main parts. Firstly, and in order to show more clearly how sovereignty is limited, two kinds of agents are introduced: (a) individuals
packet
发表于 2025-3-28 19:52:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583751/583751_42.png
Promotion
发表于 2025-3-29 00:18:35
New International Legal Positivism: Formalism by Another Name? d’Aspremont’s HLA Hart-inspired theory of the sources of international law and the nature of international law more generally, it questions the distinctiveness of the positivism they advocate and contests the contemporary value of a positivistic approach to international law.
颠簸下上
发表于 2025-3-29 03:32:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583751/583751_44.png
主动脉
发表于 2025-3-29 11:10:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583751/583751_45.png
Accord
发表于 2025-3-29 12:01:59
Before and After Legal Positivity: Peremptory Norms from Global and Transnational Social Practiceave a universal, peremptory and non-derogable character, based on the importance of their content, which appears to be in tension with the positivist vision of international law as an artificial creation, grounded on state sovereignty and consent. On the other hand, there is the seemingly paradoxica
Dedication
发表于 2025-3-29 16:29:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5838/583751/583751_47.png
seroma
发表于 2025-3-29 21:21:28
Beyond Legal Positivism in Transnational Lawt are served better through the inclusion into positive law of legal tools that have been elaborated in other parts of the world in order to promote these principles. Just as legal positivism is not an adequate theory to capture the operation of law within the state as it is traditionally understood