ear-canal 发表于 2025-3-26 23:51:16
Charles E. Osgooddevices.Analytical and transactional processing at the speedIn the last 50 years the world has been completely transformed through the use of IT. We have now reached a new inflection point. Here we present, for the first time, how in-memory computing is changing the way businesses are run. Today, enGerontology 发表于 2025-3-27 04:51:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5836/583536/583536_32.png污点 发表于 2025-3-27 07:36:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5836/583536/583536_33.png消灭 发表于 2025-3-27 13:18:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5836/583536/583536_34.pngDEAWL 发表于 2025-3-27 14:01:41
Charles E. Osgooddevices.Analytical and transactional processing at the speedIn the last 50 years the world has been completely transformed through the use of IT. We have now reached a new inflection point. Here we present, for the first time, how in-memory computing is changing the way businesses are run. Today, en独白 发表于 2025-3-27 19:14:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5836/583536/583536_36.pngPalliation 发表于 2025-3-27 22:19:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5836/583536/583536_37.png最低点 发表于 2025-3-28 03:38:46
Things and Words,e” because the most gross working principle underlying the general theory of cognizing and sentencing I am presently writing on (., Osgood, in preparation) is this: .. In what follows I will also be making the following assumptions: (1) that the “deep” cognitive system is essentially semantic in nat谈判 发表于 2025-3-28 08:24:21
The Paradigm Clash in Psycholinguistics: Revolution or Pendula Swings?, contentious—witness the exchanges between linguist Paul and psychologist Wundt around the turn of the century (cf. Blumenthal, 1970). Like all sweeping generalizations, this one has its exceptions, of course: the first edition of Leonard Bloomfield’s famous . in 1933 was explicitly within a behavioFlawless 发表于 2025-3-28 13:27:39
Structure and Meaning in Cognizing,potheses Concerning Psycholinguistics”, 1970). He questions whether the deep . (MG) could be equated with a . characterized by any ., deriving from the intuitions of linguists about relations among sentence in a language. He then goes on to state that the deep mental grammar must be equated with an