令人苦恼 发表于 2025-3-26 22:42:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_31.pngCLAP 发表于 2025-3-27 04:28:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_32.pngComedienne 发表于 2025-3-27 06:29:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_33.pngInfiltrate 发表于 2025-3-27 09:52:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_34.pngreperfusion 发表于 2025-3-27 14:41:36
Greimas, Law, Discourse and Interpretative Squares: An Author, his Squares and Legal Discourse Analy subversion of the command structures of law and legal discourse. Semiotics suggests that each “I” has to become .—in language, culture and (above all) in the presence of an other person. Language, identity and law appear coherent but by no means congruent social events.Allure 发表于 2025-3-27 21:22:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_36.png者变 发表于 2025-3-28 00:45:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_37.pngIndividual 发表于 2025-3-28 02:53:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582124/582124_38.png全部 发表于 2025-3-28 08:43:48
The Legal Semiotic Modus Operandi shows clearly the relevance of Mr. Jourdain’s parallel situation. He did not know that he wrote prose—do lawyers know that they write and operate semiotics? All three aspects, which fascinated CLS scholars, one must conclude, are at distance from this parallel as well as the practice of law.自制 发表于 2025-3-28 10:52:10
of the semiotic dimensions in legal handiwork.Provides a stThis book present a structure for understanding and exploring the semiotic character of law and law systems. Cultivating a deep understanding for the ways in which lawyers make meaning—the way in which they help make the world and are made,