evanescent 发表于 2025-3-28 15:02:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5814/581381/581381_41.pngfollicular-unit 发表于 2025-3-28 19:27:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5814/581381/581381_42.png滔滔不绝地讲 发表于 2025-3-28 23:46:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5814/581381/581381_43.pngPerineum 发表于 2025-3-29 07:04:24
elist, he was suggesting not that superior writers avoid politics altogether, but that they approach the political as an experience of “living beings” rather than inert “ideas.” Another way to describe this distinction might be to consider it as a contrast between the personal and the impersonal: thCAMEO 发表于 2025-3-29 09:47:29
Manfred Broy,María Victoria Cengarle,Eva Geisbergerontext. The second, . of 1891, was concerned with ‘contemporary life’ and the ‘inverted sexual instincts’ or ‘sexual inversion’ of a particular group of individuals oppressed by social norms and unjustly prohibitive legislation. This change in perspective in Symonds’s work, from Greek to Modern, repPALSY 发表于 2025-3-29 12:46:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5814/581381/581381_46.png翻动 发表于 2025-3-29 17:54:18
Justin Keennists, for this work illustrates a central tenet of his mature artistry: the necessary authority of the individual consciousness in defining and interpreting reality, in fiction as in life. His emphasis upon individual consciousness led to a portrayal of the writer-reader relationship that now appea弯曲道理 发表于 2025-3-29 23:09:28
Douglas S. Lange,Phillip Verbancsics,Robert S. Gutzwiller,John Reeder,Cullen Sarlesnd ‘The Great Good Place’. Because of its unique conception as an allegorical fantasy, we shall reserve ‘The Great Good Place’ for separate discussion. In these modernist fictions James not only moves toward the complex conception of themes and forms in ., but he frequently exhibits the technical virheumatology 发表于 2025-3-30 03:06:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5814/581381/581381_49.pngcajole 发表于 2025-3-30 06:03:17
Jose Faleiro,Sriram Rajamani,Kaushik Rajan,G. Ramalingam,Kapil Vaswanihaving corresponded with Descartes. Latterly, however, interest in More has been rekindled by renewed interest in the intellectual history of the seventeenth century and Renaissance. And More has been studied in the context of seventeenth-cen tury science and the wider context of seventeenth-centur