咯咯笑 发表于 2025-3-28 15:38:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581157/581157_41.pngWordlist 发表于 2025-3-28 19:01:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581157/581157_42.pngsepticemia 发表于 2025-3-29 01:47:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581157/581157_43.pngneutrophils 发表于 2025-3-29 05:19:04
Worlds and States of Affairs: How Similar Can They be?,n Salmon about how fine-grained the ontologies of worlds and states of affairs are.’ One natural way of thinking of worlds and states of affairs is as constructs out of objects and properties.’ I will argue that Salmon’s proposal fails because it presupposes an incoherent conception of what an objecDAFT 发表于 2025-3-29 09:15:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581157/581157_45.pngdagger 发表于 2025-3-29 12:02:54
Logical Atomism and Its Ontological Refinement: A Defense,lied to the .. It is now widely believed that logical atomism is untenable. But the differences between Russell and Wittgenstein show that the term `logical atomism’ is general, not singular. Possibly the objectionable aspects of their theories are not essential to logical atomism as such. I shall a鸟笼 发表于 2025-3-29 17:01:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581157/581157_47.png忙碌 发表于 2025-3-29 22:51:04
9楼intellect 发表于 2025-3-30 03:47:20
9楼paltry 发表于 2025-3-30 07:46:46
9楼