撤退 发表于 2025-3-25 06:26:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581155/581155_21.pngCommemorate 发表于 2025-3-25 08:50:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581155/581155_22.pngharbinger 发表于 2025-3-25 14:13:20
1571-3083 ienna on the Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism and was held in Vienna in July 2001. (cf. The Vienna Orcle and Logical Empiricism. Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives. Edited by Frie drich Stadler. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer, 2003, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10). All the essays in th难管 发表于 2025-3-25 15:55:12
Carnap on Truth,y definition of truth and to the later Tarskian model theory (Section 4). In Section 5, we discuss some difficulties in Carnap’s liberally empiricist treatment of scientific theories. The final section 6 makes some remarks on Carnap’s contemporary relevance.antiandrogen 发表于 2025-3-25 23:53:36
,Husserl’s Role in Carnap’s ,,vertheless, Kant and the neo-Kantians do not comprise the whole story. An equally important influence on Carnap in . (his doctoral dissertation), though perhaps slightly less so in the ., was Husserl.. This paper begins the project of tracing the precise extent and nature of that influence.确定的事 发表于 2025-3-26 03:14:38
,Carnap’s Internal and External Questions: Part I : Quine’s Criticisms,p’s distinctions, most of these criticisms post-date Quine’s comments and many of them are consciously influenced by Quine.. Nevertheless, despite this consensus I want to argue that Quine’s criticisms leave Carnap’s central points quite untouched.Apogee 发表于 2025-3-26 06:07:56
978-90-481-6258-1Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003军火 发表于 2025-3-26 08:45:43
Language, Truth and Knowledge978-94-017-0151-8Series ISSN 1571-3083outer-ear 发表于 2025-3-26 13:33:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581155/581155_29.pngCALL 发表于 2025-3-26 18:57:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581155/581155_30.png