青春期 发表于 2025-3-27 00:07:43
Book 1994Ziff has discussed in his writings: understanding, rules and regularities, proper names, the feelings of machines, expression, and aesthetic experience. Paul Ziff began his professional career as an artist, went on to study painting with J. M. Hanson at Cornell, and then studied for the Ph. D. in phCursory 发表于 2025-3-27 01:15:52
The Unnaturalness of ,,tes of languages that are capable of being learned by humans. The explanation does not itself directly address standard epistemological questions associated with mutant predicates but instead focusses on the pragmatic bases of such epistemic practices as induction and finds them unfulfilled by mutant predicates.后退 发表于 2025-3-27 06:22:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581134/581134_33.png节约 发表于 2025-3-27 12:50:06
Rhyme without Reason,e with all ideas. The typical aesthetician (or beautician, as Ziff likes to call them) is at the other end of the spectrum: indulgent as can be with ideas. A master, one might say, of the uncritical attitude.担心 发表于 2025-3-27 14:33:41
Proper Names: Possibility and Culture,ll balance this negativism by upholding Kripke elsewhere. Given the explosion, I am hard put to say much that is very new. I will often be citing insights of others. Still, Wittgenstein recommended assembling reminders for a purpose. Roughly, my purpose will be to praise culture, while burying possibility, as relevant to PN workings.狂热文化 发表于 2025-3-27 18:14:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581134/581134_36.pngMEET 发表于 2025-3-28 01:41:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8313-815th century; Africa; Paul Ziff; aesthetics; art; culture; experience; language; mind; morality; oral discours银版照相 发表于 2025-3-28 05:12:59
,Paul Ziff, 1958–1960: A Reminiscence,nd also in some small measure, in the tribute (and gratitude) that they are meant to express. Although presented from a single perspective — the one from which . see best — they give, I think, an objective account of certain important but under-appreciated aspects of a complex man. In this regard, I know that I speak for many.土产 发表于 2025-3-28 07:13:12
Why Machines Can Neither Think nor Feel,s, not organisms, not living creatures. There could be a broken-down robot but not a dead one. Only living creatures can literally have feelings.”. Since machines are not living things they cannot have feelings.眼界 发表于 2025-3-28 13:59:48
Aesthetics and Baseball,ittle scared by the word “aesthetic” and partly because it is probably not the perfect phrase for the question I want to raise. Perhaps there is no perfect phrase. Still, there is a question I want to ask.