Inferior
发表于 2025-3-23 10:01:34
0166-6991 y of language, philosophy of mind and epistemology, hissystem of thought is unified by his inquiries into the nature ofinterpretation and understanding the speech and behavior of others..Together with its introduction,.Language, Mind and Epistemology.examines Davidson‘s unified stance towards philos
欢呼
发表于 2025-3-23 17:29:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581133/581133_12.png
刺激
发表于 2025-3-23 18:39:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581133/581133_13.png
背心
发表于 2025-3-24 00:04:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581133/581133_14.png
动作谜
发表于 2025-3-24 04:59:24
Book 1994age, philosophy of mind and epistemology, hissystem of thought is unified by his inquiries into the nature ofinterpretation and understanding the speech and behavior of others..Together with its introduction,.Language, Mind and Epistemology.examines Davidson‘s unified stance towards philosophy by jo
真
发表于 2025-3-24 08:01:23
Meaning, Holism and the Problem of Extensionalitynguage is to provide a general, abstract characterization of meaning theories for natural languages; to make clear, in particular, what form they should take and what conditions of adequacy they should be required to satisfy.
Isometric
发表于 2025-3-24 11:37:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581133/581133_17.png
阐明
发表于 2025-3-24 18:42:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5812/581133/581133_18.png
dowagers-hump
发表于 2025-3-24 21:50:21
Eigennamen und Kennzeichnungen — Anmerkungen zur Sogenannten Frege-Russell-Theorieifficulties. These kinds of problems do not arise for Russell. It is further shown that in “Über Sinn and Bedeutung” Frege already anticipated Russell’s theory of descriptions and consequently — from his point of view — rejected it. Finally some remarks are made on basic correspondencies between Russell and Kripke.
神经
发表于 2025-3-25 02:57:01
Dividing the Selfis the way it presses on the nature of the mental; for ‘holism’ tells us that something can be construed as a belief or an intention only if it is linked to other such states in those generally rational ways that internal irrationality apparently ignores.