越自我 发表于 2025-3-25 04:20:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581032/581032_21.pngFoment 发表于 2025-3-25 08:21:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581032/581032_22.pngintoxicate 发表于 2025-3-25 13:43:18
978-1-349-35718-5Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2008上流社会 发表于 2025-3-25 19:31:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581032/581032_24.png弄污 发表于 2025-3-26 00:03:08
Book 2008The author offers a new assessment of the influence of the Vienna Circle on language study, and considers its relevance to the debate in present-day linguistics about the relative merits of ‘intuitive‘ and ‘real life‘ sources of data.预示 发表于 2025-3-26 01:09:48
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583030bibliography; empiricism; falsification; interpret; language; language study; linguistics; philosophy; ViennCommunicate 发表于 2025-3-26 04:50:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581032/581032_27.pngGene408 发表于 2025-3-26 10:35:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581032/581032_28.pngfertilizer 发表于 2025-3-26 15:03:38
Holism,ve considered themselves to be theorists of language. Popper himself was openly dismissive of language as a focus of study in its own right, repeating in his writings different formulations of the stark dictum that ‘I never quarrel about words’ (Popper 1935: 131 ).STIT 发表于 2025-3-26 19:09:14
Oslo Philosophy,nse, both Austin and Naess attempted to define a new and more truly empirical style of philosophy, each becoming recognized as the leader of a specific, geographically localized philosophical movement. Both Oxford ordinary language philosophy and the Oslo school of philosophy flourished in the years