Jogging
发表于 2025-3-23 13:21:02
Comparative Language Politics,e distinctiveness of global regions and subregions adds to the complexity and unpredictability of rising interdependence among countries. In essence, tugs and pulls at global, regional, and subregional levels make the impact of rising interdependence on countries uneven.
反省
发表于 2025-3-23 16:52:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5810/580972/580972_12.png
放大
发表于 2025-3-23 19:00:06
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
Armada
发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5810/580972/580972_14.png
dapper
发表于 2025-3-24 06:24:00
Language Politics and Integration in the Americas: Propositions and Framework,r further specifies North American distinctiveness by deriving a series of propositions about language politics there. Case studies in subsequent chapters (Chapters 3–6) build on these propositions, and a final chapter presents overall conclusions.
迎合
发表于 2025-3-24 07:04:17
Conclusion,they are all self-standing. At the same time, all the chapters examine the topic, ., from different perspectives and in so doing point toward more general conclusions. The specific conclusions advanced in Chapters 1–6 together provide a foundation for overall conclusions here.
格言
发表于 2025-3-24 12:10:33
ds to the sensitivity and complexity of language politics, whether in North America, South America or Europe. This book shows how language politics vary across the Americas and contrast with Europe..978-1-137-56147-3
甜食
发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5810/580972/580972_18.png
coalition
发表于 2025-3-24 22:24:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56147-3area; complexity; cultural policy; culture; desegregation; Europe; international relations; policy; politica
无节奏
发表于 2025-3-25 00:11:14
Michael A. Morriss disclosure of the unique ‘who’ of each agent. It aims to illuminate Arendt’s critique of sovereign rule, totalitarianism, and world-alienation, her defense of a distinct political sphere for engaged citizen action and judgment, her conception of the ‘right to have rights,’ and her rejection of tel