时间
发表于 2025-3-21 17:40:48
书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>书目名称La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0580196<br><br> <br><br>
笨拙处理
发表于 2025-3-21 22:10:36
Statistical explanation,general regularity consists in subsuming it under another, more comprehensive regularity, under a more general law’ (, p. 135). Following the suggestion of William Dray, this account of explanation is often called the . ..
Inferior
发表于 2025-3-22 02:10:26
Issues relating to the meaning of psychology as a science,ouped under the heading of ‘total psychology,’ a label he invented to characterize those viewpoints critical of strict scientific psychology because of its narrow approach to the subject matter of psychology.
左右连贯
发表于 2025-3-22 04:42:45
Book 1982ophy (Firenze 1968), edited by Raymond Klibansky. As with the earlier series the present chronicles purport to give a survey of significant trends in contemporary philosophi cal discussion. The time space covered by the present series is (approximately) 1966-1978. The need for such surveys has, I b
LEER
发表于 2025-3-22 10:58:55
Philosophy of technology,m of the Age of Enlightenment. As Koselleck documents, the biological and social theories of evolution of the 19th century fostered the expectation of unlimited material growth and also, by derivation, of social, cultural, and even moral progress for mankind, to be achieved by means of science, technology and industry.
免除责任
发表于 2025-3-22 14:01:14
Philosophy and biology,h are devoted exclusively to the philosophy of biology, and biology as a scientific discipline plays a greater role in these works than it did in their predecessors (, , , , , , , , , ; see also Hull , and Kleiner forreviews).
流眼泪
发表于 2025-3-22 18:26:24
ary Philosophy (Firenze 1968), edited by Raymond Klibansky. As with the earlier series the present chronicles purport to give a survey of significant trends in contemporary philosophi cal discussion. The time space covered by the present series is (approximately) 1966-1978. The need for such survey
Atmosphere
发表于 2025-3-23 00:07:29
Introduction, social and historical human sciences as well as the natural sciences. The term ‘science’ is here consequently used in a broader sense than is usually the case, particularly within Anglo-American philosophy.
Synthesize
发表于 2025-3-23 01:30:45
,The Erklären-Verstehen controversy in the philosophy of the natural and human sciences,uggest an epistemological foundation for the methodological autonomy-claim of the historical sciences or, more generally, of the ‘Geisteswissenschaften’. These were considered to be based on Hermeneutics qua ‘Kunstlehre des Verstehens’ (F.E.D. Schleiermacher, A. Boeckh) in contradiction to the natur
crease
发表于 2025-3-23 08:08:56
Causation and teleology in contemporary philosophy of science,posedly reflects the order in which they pass through it and their relations of generality, if not also reducibility. This typology for the sciences and its associated sociology of science attracts little attention today, and it is usually treated as reflecting superficial, dogmatic and irrelevant s