形容词词尾 发表于 2025-3-26 21:25:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5442/544177/544177_31.png

onlooker 发表于 2025-3-27 03:50:01

Indeterminacy of Identity of Objects: An Exercise in Metaphysical Aestheticsal adequacy over simplicity of theory. But the theory is not all that complex after all, and it is certainly not complex when compared with the bivalent alternatives. The picture we propose is neither fuzzy nor (literally) plurivalent; we also find it lovely; thus our subtitle.

LINE 发表于 2025-3-27 08:49:40

Book 2000iven Quine‘s preeminent position, this book must be ofinterest to students of philosophy in general, Quine aficionados, andmost particularly to those working in the areas of epistemology,ontology, philosophies of language, of logic, and of science.

Aggregate 发表于 2025-3-27 13:22:36

On the Existence of Meaningsls “the museum myth”, and in addition that we should endorse a qualified form of his behaviourism regarding semantics; but I will suggest that these ideas ought to have led him, and ought to lead us, to a use theory of meanings rather than to a denial of meanings.

ADJ 发表于 2025-3-27 13:42:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5442/544177/544177_35.png

abduction 发表于 2025-3-27 18:58:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5442/544177/544177_36.png

overwrought 发表于 2025-3-28 00:26:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5442/544177/544177_37.png

Decimate 发表于 2025-3-28 03:57:52

http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5442/544177/544177_38.png

Fulminate 发表于 2025-3-28 07:02:14

Indefinite Objects of Higher Orderole, since it brings into prominence the Quinean theme of identity conditions: “No entity without identity.” At the same time, our discussion will confront what I will call the Basic Objection to many-valued theories, also due to Quine: that they are simply too messy..

Myosin 发表于 2025-3-28 14:14:31

0068-0346 ection are by some ofthe leading figures in their fields and they touch on the most recentturnings in Quine‘s work. The book also features an essay by Quinehimself, and his replies to each of the papers. Questions are raisedconcerning Quine‘s views on knowledge: observation, holism, truth,naturalize
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine; Alex Orenstein,Petr Kotatko Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 L