FADE 发表于 2025-3-25 05:01:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5440/543923/543923_21.pngMAPLE 发表于 2025-3-25 08:32:15
978-1-349-43920-1Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014敌意 发表于 2025-3-25 14:27:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5440/543923/543923_23.png失望昨天 发表于 2025-3-25 18:43:16
Palgrave Innovations in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/543923.jpg物质 发表于 2025-3-25 20:25:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5440/543923/543923_25.pngAura231 发表于 2025-3-26 03:12:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5440/543923/543923_26.pngCYN 发表于 2025-3-26 07:36:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5440/543923/543923_27.png相容 发表于 2025-3-26 10:04:37
Introduction: Lessons from Gettierems to emerge and be tentatively endorsed (at least in the latter dialogue). According to that account, knowledge isn’t just true belief, since one might make a lucky guess, but all that we need to add is a justification condition to rule such cases out; to know that P is to have a . that P. This is尽责 发表于 2025-3-26 13:51:59
Beliefcording to one, knowledge rather than belief is taken to be the most important mental state with mind-to-world fit. We will discuss this view in detail in the final chapter. Our present concern is with the suggestion that belief can somehow be understood in terms of knowledge. There are a number of藕床生厌倦 发表于 2025-3-26 20:33:02
Justification of knowledge, and I noted that there are at least four distinct proposals to be considered here.. First, we have Williamson’s influential suggestion that one’s total evidence just is one’s knowledge, and that it is knowledge that justifies belief. According to the second approach, to have a justifi