无法修复
发表于 2025-3-21 16:41:36
书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Knowing the Structure of Nature读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0543817<br><br> <br><br>
febrile
发表于 2025-3-21 21:27:07
Book 2009In this sequel to the highly acclaimed Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , Psillos discusses recent developments in scientific realism and explores realist theses and commitments. He examines the structuralist turn in the philosophy of science and offers a framework within which inference to the best explanation can be defended.
竖琴
发表于 2025-3-22 03:22:27
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666metaphysics; philosophy of science; science; truth
罗盘
发表于 2025-3-22 06:56:46
http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/543817.jpg
点燃
发表于 2025-3-22 11:21:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5439/543817/543817_5.png
affinity
发表于 2025-3-22 15:29:31
Simply the Best: A Case for Abductionive Induction (EI) and the Method of Hypothesis, I will try to show that abduction, suitably understood as inference to the best explanation (IBE), offers the best description of scientific method and solves the foregoing problem in the best way: it strikes the best balance between ampliation and epistemic warrant.
squander
发表于 2025-3-22 18:19:38
Thinking About the Ultimate Argument for Realism authors of the argument, however, did not put an extra stress on . predictions, which, as Musgrave (1988) makes plain, is the litmus test for the ability of any approach to science to explain the success of science.
中古
发表于 2025-3-22 23:52:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5439/543817/543817_8.png
MUT
发表于 2025-3-23 01:49:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5439/543817/543817_9.png
NEG
发表于 2025-3-23 08:17:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5439/543817/543817_10.png