愉快吗 发表于 2025-3-26 21:06:08
Book 2022ach that helps broaden our epistemological horizons. It presents a collection of perspectives on epistemic agency by engaging philosophical traditions east and west, including Japanese, Buddhist, Confucian, Daoist, and Anglo-analytic. .干涉 发表于 2025-3-27 03:13:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_32.pngOverride 发表于 2025-3-27 05:31:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_33.pngsleep-spindles 发表于 2025-3-27 11:55:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_34.png愤怒历史 发表于 2025-3-27 13:50:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_35.png周兴旺 发表于 2025-3-27 19:34:23
The Possibility of the Extended Knowerould have to be constitutive of the extended knower. I also show that Hetherington’s criticism of Reed’s scepticism is not successful, and that there is no reason to believe that Clark and Chalmers would hold that there is the extended knower in Hetherington’s sense.畸形 发表于 2025-3-28 01:32:29
Introduction,eptions of knowledge. Three meanings of extension are employed across the volume’s chapters. First, the chapters challenge prevailing conceptions of knowledge in Western epistemology. Second, they propose that to have knowledge is not only to have ideas cogitating in the mind, but also to perceive,并置 发表于 2025-3-28 02:18:58
Knowing-Toogy should also encompass a distinct concept of knowing-to. Only with the addition of knowing-to can knowledge-how ever be . in a particular action within a particular setting. Unlike the possibly longer-lasting knowledge-how, knowing-to is fleeting and contextual. It is inherent within what Gilbert新字 发表于 2025-3-28 07:56:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_39.pngPigeon 发表于 2025-3-28 13:39:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5438/543799/543799_40.png