暗讽 发表于 2025-3-23 12:01:23
Conjunctive and Disjunctive Parts,en contents. There is ., corresponding to the relationship between disjunct and disjunction, and there is ., corresponding to the relationship between conjunctions and their conjuncts. Fine associates these with two notions of parthood: . and .. Conjunctive parthood is a very useful notion, allowing抛弃的货物 发表于 2025-3-23 17:25:37
Truth-Maker Semantics for Some Substructural Logics,n a relation of exact verification between states and formulas. A natural question arises as to what are the limits of Fine’s approach and whether an exact semantics of similar kind can be constructed for other important non-classical logics. In our paper, we will generalize Fine’s approach and deveExclaim 发表于 2025-3-23 18:04:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5432/543142/543142_13.pngInvertebrate 发表于 2025-3-23 22:18:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5432/543142/543142_14.pngpessimism 发表于 2025-3-24 04:29:12
,Counterfactuals, Infinity and Paradox, that a satisfactory resolution of these paradoxes will have wide ranging implications for the logic of counterfactuals. I then situate these puzzles in the context of the wider role of counterfactuals, connecting them to indicative conditionals, probabilities, rationality and the direction of causa粘连 发表于 2025-3-24 06:52:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5432/543142/543142_16.pngN防腐剂 发表于 2025-3-24 13:38:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5432/543142/543142_17.png易于 发表于 2025-3-24 16:46:48
Truth-Maker Semantics for Some Substructural Logics,lop an exact semantics for some substructural logics. In particular, we will provide a truthmaker semantics for the Non-associative Lambek calculus and some of its extensions. This generalization will reveal some interesting connections between Fine’s recent work on truthmaker semantics and his early work on relevant logic.含糊 发表于 2025-3-24 22:22:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5432/543142/543142_19.pngInstantaneous 发表于 2025-3-24 23:59:14
,Truthmaker Semantics for Epistemic Logic, a conditional knowledge operator, drawing on notions of implication and content that are prominent in Fine’s work. We demonstrate that different logics are thereby generated, bearing on the aforementioned epistemic principles. Finally, we offer preliminary observations about the prospects for each logic.