satisficer
发表于 2025-3-21 20:06:32
书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0542719<br><br> <br><br>
perpetual
发表于 2025-3-21 23:02:43
The Replaceability Argument,cussed. If other authors discuss the Replaceability Argument it is always a reaction to Singer. Therefore, my exploration of the Replaceability Argument will be presented in dialogue with Singer’s take on the issue.
chuckle
发表于 2025-3-22 02:24:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542719/542719_3.png
deviate
发表于 2025-3-22 07:16:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542719/542719_4.png
闯入
发表于 2025-3-22 09:00:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542719/542719_5.png
受辱
发表于 2025-3-22 12:52:51
Animals and the Harm of Death,nto account is compatible with sending the child to school, but not the dog. The reason is that the dog would not benefit from being sent to school. So, different interests can justify different treatment.
CYN
发表于 2025-3-22 17:06:18
The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/542719.jpg
渐强
发表于 2025-3-23 01:12:27
Book 2013Is it acceptable to kill an animal that has been granted a pleasant life? This book rigorously explores the moral basis of the ideal of animal-friendly animal husbandry and sheds new light on utilitarian moral theory by pointing out the assumptions and implications of two different versions of utilitarianism, with surprising conclusions.
Insufficient
发表于 2025-3-23 04:30:07
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286277ethics; identity; Moral; morality; Utilitarianism
无底
发表于 2025-3-23 07:43:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542719/542719_10.png