reception
发表于 2025-3-25 03:40:22
,Hegel’s Philosophy of History,words, when it considers the nature of history as something which is only an object of our understanding and our knowledge without acknowledging the importance of individual existence in the shaping of the historical phenomenon.
排名真古怪
发表于 2025-3-25 11:11:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_22.png
frozen-shoulder
发表于 2025-3-25 11:54:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_23.png
十字架
发表于 2025-3-25 19:52:42
,Heidegger’s Response to the Problem of History,quired in order to acquire a fuller and richer picture of the nature of history. Hegel points to knowledge of the past as the only ob(ective feaiure of history, while Kierkegaard emphasises the role of personal choice In making history. A tension Is created thus between an ‘objective’ and eplstemolo
MUTED
发表于 2025-3-25 20:28:11
Conclusion,oing debate is mainly focused on the possible ways we can either know or understand or interpret something which already took place. . History, then, appears to be orientated either towards knowledge of the past or interpretation of the past in the present. Hence, as I will show in the next paragrap
不能和解
发表于 2025-3-26 01:05:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_26.png
miniature
发表于 2025-3-26 06:20:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_27.png
预测
发表于 2025-3-26 09:51:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_28.png
惰性女人
发表于 2025-3-26 15:03:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5428/542713/542713_29.png
Tortuous
发表于 2025-3-26 19:12:36
Georgios Patioscertain parameters in practical applications, the question of choice among the interval alternatives is started brewing. This unattended question of ranking any two interval numbers has created a new enthusiasm among the researchers during only the last two decades.