协定
发表于 2025-3-28 15:59:25
How, and For How Long, Did Keynes Maintain , Theory?gridge (1973) and Patinkin (1976, 1982), there followed Dimand (1988), Amadeo (1989), Clarke (1988,1998), Melzer (1988), Moggridge (1992), Skidelsky (1992), Laidler (1999), and others. This is no wonder, for the Keynesian Revolution remains the most singular phenomenon that economic theory and polic
Vertical
发表于 2025-3-28 20:55:23
The Turning Point in Keynes’s Theoretical Development: From , to here exactly is the change to be located? These questions are crucial in understanding the Keynesian Revolution, and many interpretations have consequently been put forward. In our view, however, they lack the groundwork of thorough investigation. The present paper seeks to answer these questions co
词汇表
发表于 2025-3-28 23:27:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5427/542627/542627_43.png
amphibian
发表于 2025-3-29 06:17:40
On the Commodity Control Schemescene in the 1940s. Among other things, it is our aim to clarify (i) the significance of a buffer stock plan in Keynes’s economic thought, and (ii) how and why the plan was transmuted in the political situation of the time.
Crumple
发表于 2025-3-29 07:43:19
The Welfare State in the Making: W. Beveridge and Keynese field of economic theory and policy with his ., and Beveridge, who laid the foundations of the social security system with the .. As will be seen, Keynes and Beveridge endeavored in close collaboration to see their ideas implemented in the 1940s, earning the whole-hearted support of young economis
散步
发表于 2025-3-29 13:20:39
and “My Early Beliefs”tention from various angles. The reasons for this were, among others; (i) the only memoir which showed the path of thought followed by the economist who brought about the “Keynesian Revolution”; (ii) the ethical path pursued by a central member of the Bloomsbury Group; (iii) the path taken by an imp
贪婪性
发表于 2025-3-29 16:23:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5427/542627/542627_47.png
mortuary
发表于 2025-3-29 21:00:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5427/542627/542627_48.png
Insensate
发表于 2025-3-30 01:07:20
Liberal Interventionism: D.H. Robertson’s Social Philosophyn criticizes those who advocate the New Welfare Economics, such as Hicks of ordinal utility theory (Pareto’s position) and Samuelson of revealed preference theory, and expresses his full support for Pigou’s theory of cardinal utility. Robertson is also widely known for his original economic fluctuat
赏钱
发表于 2025-3-30 05:31:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5427/542627/542627_50.png