ICLE
发表于 2025-3-25 04:46:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5421/542072/542072_21.png
harmony
发表于 2025-3-25 11:04:34
Michael Ruse water quality and 5) production and technology adoption. The selected papers for the book fall entirely within these categories. The book ‘‘Frontiers in Water Resource Economics" draws to a great extent on papers which were presented at the 7^^ Conference of the International Water and Re source E
HARD
发表于 2025-3-25 12:31:15
Karl Popper: His Philosophy and Science,d argument from belief. In this challenging philosophical vision Popper defines reason in negative terms, as an agent of destruction of knowledge claims, and views all knowledge as conjectural, hypothetical and provisional.
从容
发表于 2025-3-25 17:31:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5421/542072/542072_24.png
incubus
发表于 2025-3-25 20:35:20
MOND and Methodologykeness’ or ‘verisimilitude’ essentially impossible since the two groups of scientists achieve correspondence with the facts in fundamentally different ways, and I suggest that a better guide to the theories’ progress toward the truth might be the methodologies themselves.
发展
发表于 2025-3-26 02:26:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5421/542072/542072_26.png
Obstacle
发表于 2025-3-26 07:38:45
Popper on Quantification and Identityuction to his theory of quantification and identity, accessible to non-specialists. Popper’s theory of quantification underwent significant modifications over the course of his published articles, subsequent corrections to those articles, and in unpublished correspondence with other logicians. We pr
心痛
发表于 2025-3-26 10:05:59
Logical Maximalism in the Empirical Scienceslsificationist methodology will be compared with the recently advocated extension of the abductive methodology from the empirical sciences to logic by T. Williamson, since both of them arrive at the same conclusion concerning the status of classical logic.
高谈阔论
发表于 2025-3-26 14:58:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5421/542072/542072_29.png
NORM
发表于 2025-3-26 20:34:29
The Arkansas Creationism Trial Forty Years Onhical life had been dedicated to the importance of evidence and rationality. It was therefore nigh mandated that I would use Popper’s philosophy to oppose the Creationists’ embrace of Kuhn. I was happy to do so—and, incidentally, successful, for explicitly citing my Popperian testimony the judge rul