诽谤 发表于 2025-3-23 10:46:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21943-8access; Immanuel Kant; Jacques Derrida; Kant; knowledge; morality; nature; oral discourse; subjectcolostrum 发表于 2025-3-23 15:44:50
The Background,This book will examine Kant’s ., and will be concerned with both historical and conceptual matters. Arguably that text is the first systematic study of aesthetic theory to be produced in the history of modern philosophy, and it raises issues which, if in somewhat changed form, still generate debate among aestheticians.古董 发表于 2025-3-23 21:40:22
The Necessity of Judgements of Taste,We suggested that Kant needs to discover some reason for making aesthetic judgements. Satisfaction of this need will provide confirmation . for the particular actual judgements we make which, prior to confirmation, only have subjective necessity.Repatriate 发表于 2025-3-24 00:30:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541856/541856_14.png葡萄糖 发表于 2025-3-24 05:23:48
http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/541856.jpg征服 发表于 2025-3-24 09:35:07
re of aesthetic claims, examines the scope of Kant‘s justification of their validity, and shows how these lead Kant to investigate the relationship between beautiful objects, morality, and subjects. In the course of his discussion, the author links Kant‘s theory to contemporary commentaries, includiCANT 发表于 2025-3-24 13:10:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541856/541856_17.pngNmda-Receptor 发表于 2025-3-24 15:49:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541856/541856_18.png虚构的东西 发表于 2025-3-24 19:57:05
tween beautiful objects, morality, and subjects. In the course of his discussion, the author links Kant‘s theory to contemporary commentaries, including those by Donald Crawford, Jacques Derrida, Paul Guyer, Rudolph Makkreel, Mary McCloskey, and Kenneth Rogerson.978-1-349-21945-2978-1-349-21943-8小母马 发表于 2025-3-25 01:41:53
,The ‘Analytic of the Beautiful’,nowledge’ in order to understand what makes it legitimate. His search for justification leads him to formulate a supreme principle of morality, which embodies the only satisfactory model of rational behaviour, and so sustains the legitimacy of the moral demands we make of each other as beings capable of acting rationally.