impale
发表于 2025-3-23 12:59:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40883-5God; evil; suffering; morality; free will
–LOUS
发表于 2025-3-23 17:43:28
Sami Pihlström,Sari KivistöCombines both literary and philosophical methodologies, in order to examine and confront evil and antitheodicy. Examines and defends a wide range of antitheodicisms, analysing post-Holocaust ethics, W
EXALT
发表于 2025-3-23 20:12:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541843/541843_13.png
fixed-joint
发表于 2025-3-24 01:29:16
Franz Kafka’s .The Trial., Samuel Beckett’s .Waiting for Godot., andGeorge Orwell’s .Nineteen Eighty-Four., are examined in order to cruciallyadvance the philosophical case for antitheodicism. .978-3-319-82209-9978-3-319-40883-5
invert
发表于 2025-3-24 05:23:55
Introduction,and philosophical. Generally, . seek a justification, legitimation, and/or excusing of an omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent God’s allowing the world to contain evil and suffering. By antitheodicism, Kivistö and Pihlström mean the rejection of any such, or ., theodicies, or better, of the very p
Estimable
发表于 2025-3-24 09:51:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541843/541843_16.png
灿烂
发表于 2025-3-24 13:54:02
Suffering and Forgiveness in Kafka and Post-Holocaust Antitheodicism,ions they find unjust. Such protagonists’ experience tells us that there can be no moral order or harmony unless human beings themselves struggle for a better world. This moral resistance to harmonious world-explanations is the heart of antitheodicism. This chapter begins with an analysis of ., conn
adjacent
发表于 2025-3-24 16:01:24
Evil, Absurdity, and Nonsense: Beckettian and Wittgensteinian Reflections,sophers’ work, as well as the kind of absurdity of suffering explored by Samuel Beckett in . (1951). While the general topic of meaningless suffering is a theme running through the entire book, the Wittgensteinian focus on questions of meaning and the explorations of nonsensicality in absurd drama m
是贪求
发表于 2025-3-24 19:44:31
Pragmatism, Suffering, and Truthfulness: From James to Rorty to Orwell,eorge Orwell’s . (1949) turns out to be necessary for serious engagement with the problem of evil and suffering. This context invokes the debates over pragmatist conceptions of truth and neopragmatism exemplified by Richard Rorty’s work, which also contains a controversial reading of Orwell’s famous
TRACE
发表于 2025-3-25 00:57:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541843/541843_20.png