青春期
发表于 2025-3-27 00:12:32
Deceptive Unity and Productive Disunity: Kant’s Account of Situated Moral Selvesity of autonomy as a characterization of our practical reason and the idea of moral requirements as requirements of reason, which are clear to ordinary humans. This suggests a picture of ordered, unified, autonomous rational agents aware of what morality requires and transparent to themselves. And b
外科医生
发表于 2025-3-27 03:58:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541827/541827_32.png
善于
发表于 2025-3-27 06:20:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541827/541827_33.png
FER
发表于 2025-3-27 11:29:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541827/541827_34.png
声音刺耳
发表于 2025-3-27 16:40:18
Humans-Only Norms: An Unexpected Kantian Storyy.” And Kant interprets “strict universality” to mean that such norms apply not merely to all human beings but to “all rational beings in general.” But Louden draws attention to a second kind of norm in Kant’s philosophy—“humans-only norms.” These norms are impure, a posteriori, and empirical. After
ELATE
发表于 2025-3-27 18:38:44
Beyond Our Given Nature: Kant on the Inviolable , of Humanity reserved for God. However, a specific term plays an important role in Kant’s ethics and relates it to religion in a particular and yet not sufficiently acknowledged way: it is the concept of .. But it is not the human being as such that is holy, but rather the moral law that serves as a ground for
Interlocking
发表于 2025-3-28 00:41:12
How Common Is Common Human Reason? The Plurality of Moral Perspectives and Kant’s Ethicsmmitted to in virtue of her common human reason. While Kantians especially in the last few years have explicitly acknowledged the central role of common human reason for a correct understanding of Kant’s ethics, there has been very little detailed critical discussion of the very notion of a common h
chapel
发表于 2025-3-28 04:27:07
The Philosopher’s Medicine of the Mind: Kant’s Account of Mental Illness and the Normativity of Thinand he seems to attribute to human beings at least some responsibility for preventing mental illness. In spite of these apparent disadvantages, Thomason argues that Kant’s account of mental illness can be illuminating to his views about the normative dimensions of human cognition. In contrast to cur
遭受
发表于 2025-3-28 08:21:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541827/541827_39.png
Defense
发表于 2025-3-28 13:43:03
Kant and Privacyy very clear idea what it is.” Varden agrees with Thomson that there is no one distinct right to privacy. Instead, our normative concerns regarding privacy encompass central emotional, ethical, and legal ones. Nonetheless, Varden argues that there is a distinct . idea of right to privacy, and that K