头盔
发表于 2025-3-26 23:05:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_31.png
Emmenagogue
发表于 2025-3-27 01:23:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_32.png
Gustatory
发表于 2025-3-27 06:46:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_33.png
DEVIL
发表于 2025-3-27 12:34:05
New Labour’s Welfare Reforms: The New Dealsove their chances of securing employment within a more prudently managed and stable economy’ (Purdy, 2000, p. 185). This approach was epitomized by the New Deals, which are the focus of the present chapter.
entitle
发表于 2025-3-27 17:11:01
Foreign Policy: The Iraq War of 2003lained, ‘the Labour Government does not accept that political values can be left behind when we check in our passports to travel on diplomatic business’, and for this reason must act to ‘support the demands of other peoples for the democratic rights on which we insist for ourselves’ (1997, pp. 1–2).
有帮助
发表于 2025-3-27 21:48:17
The Context of Argumentation of moral justification. Thus, the first section provides the standard definitions of consequentialism, deontology and virtue theory that moral philosophers would accept, while the following three sections draw on the work of Barry, Dworkin and MacIntyre to explore how each theory may be employed in actual political argument.
micturition
发表于 2025-3-27 23:11:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_37.png
flimsy
发表于 2025-3-28 03:11:02
Conclusioniership. Next, I outline the policies introduced by the Brown government in the four areas and the arguments used to promote them, and I compare them with those examined elsewhere in this book. In the final section, I consider the implications of the case of New Labour for our understanding of the process of political justification.
天真
发表于 2025-3-28 08:10:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_39.png
细胞学
发表于 2025-3-28 11:50:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5018/501775/501775_40.png