Yourself 发表于 2025-3-23 10:59:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-475-4Interim measures of protection; Binding force; Enforceability; Irreparable damage; Jus cogensMucosa 发表于 2025-3-23 15:33:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5017/501685/501685_12.png步履蹒跚 发表于 2025-3-23 18:42:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5017/501685/501685_13.png抛媚眼 发表于 2025-3-23 23:12:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5017/501685/501685_14.pngdecipher 发表于 2025-3-24 06:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5017/501685/501685_15.pngIndelible 发表于 2025-3-24 10:36:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5017/501685/501685_16.pngescalate 发表于 2025-3-24 11:58:03
Ewa Sałkiewicz-MunnerlynA new approach to understanding the binding force of the interim measures, based on recent cases brought before the ICJ.Focuses on the evolution of these procedural measures at both courts, taking intCeramic 发表于 2025-3-24 15:00:46
http://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/501685.jpgSpinous-Process 发表于 2025-3-24 22:50:51
,Provisional Measures of Protection in the Jurisprudence of International Courts—Historical Outline,itral Tribunals (MATs)/Tribunaux Arbitraux Mixtes (TAMs), the Court of Justice for Central America, the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice. It demonstrates the difference between the TAMs and the other international tribunals, because private individuals比目鱼 发表于 2025-3-24 23:40:27
Competence,estion of the Court‘s competence in the interim measures of protection procedure will be shown based on the position of the doctrine. Also the doctrine . and the evidence of provisional measures in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) will be presented. It suggests that there must be . evidence