superfluous 发表于 2025-3-23 09:57:36
We Owe It To Sigwart! A New Look at the Content/Object Distinction in Early Phenomenological Theorio made no distinction between the content and the object of mental acts: he ‘seems to place the real world beyond the reach of thought’ (Jacquette 1990: 181, Jacquette 2004: 107; see also Jacquette 2006: 12). By distinguishing sharply between content and object instead, Twardowski went beyond BrentaSTERN 发表于 2025-3-23 17:35:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_12.pngDRAFT 发表于 2025-3-23 21:39:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_13.png粗鲁的人 发表于 2025-3-23 22:13:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_14.pngWernickes-area 发表于 2025-3-24 04:00:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_15.png大雨 发表于 2025-3-24 10:31:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_16.png喧闹 发表于 2025-3-24 12:45:01
Judgement and Truth in the Early Wittgenstein,f intentionality, this account being nothing other than the famous picture theory. The second theme is an important aspect of that account, which I call the ‘antecedence of sense’. Sense (aka a particular notion of sentence meaning) antecedes or is logically prior to both judgement and truth. Withou古董 发表于 2025-3-24 15:43:44
Book 2013What is judgement? is a question that has exercised generations of philosophers. Early analytic philosophers (Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein) and phenomenologists (Brentano, Husserl and Reinach) changed how philosophers think about this question. This book explores and assesses their contributions and help us to retrace their steps.aqueduct 发表于 2025-3-24 20:53:45
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286338Edmund Husserl; Ludwig Wittgenstein; phenomenology; philosophyExclaim 发表于 2025-3-25 01:32:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5014/501374/501374_20.png