obstruct 发表于 2025-3-23 11:51:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501127/501127_11.png友好 发表于 2025-3-23 17:24:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501127/501127_12.pngfalsehood 发表于 2025-3-23 20:01:38
Yasmin Solomonescuzing the aspects of texts—their material forms—that resist, rather than conform to, conventional modes of interpretation. In the first chapter, guided by the photogram-poetics of Susan Howe, emergent poetics allows us to uncouple technical media from human interpretation. In essence, Howe’s poetry cLatency 发表于 2025-3-24 01:00:39
lligent Management Information Systems (IMIS 2023).Written b.This book contains the proceedings of the ECAI 2023 Workshop on Intelligent Management Information Systems (IMIS 2023). IMIS 2023 was part of the 26th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI 2023, held in Krakow from Septemberfiscal 发表于 2025-3-24 02:51:23
Yasmin Solomonescu of diverse change initiatives, offering a method to explore, select, and reflect on system boundaries. This work contributes an original perspective to the theoretical foundation of sustainability opportunity studies, elucidating the significance of process mapping in deriving pertinent outcomes.indoctrinate 发表于 2025-3-24 08:50:58
Yasmin Solomonescuffers managerial insights and prompts further inquiry into the nuanced relationship between insolvency and CSR. Finally, this paper contributes fresh insights to the emerging CSR research in Italy, particularly within the service sector, providing valuable groundwork for comparative analysis acrossgait-cycle 发表于 2025-3-24 11:48:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501127/501127_17.pngcritic 发表于 2025-3-24 18:07:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501127/501127_18.pngInduction 发表于 2025-3-24 20:58:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501127/501127_19.pngAdmire 发表于 2025-3-24 23:13:28
Yasmin Solomonescuattributes agency to the collaged print fragments themselves. By foregrounding the printed medium, rather than its “content,” Howe resists the conventional hermeneutic impulse toward textual interpretation, instead attempting to conjure the “ghosts” of the texts’ authors (which, as I will argue, is