晚间
发表于 2025-3-25 04:43:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_21.png
fatuity
发表于 2025-3-25 11:09:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_22.png
Lipoprotein
发表于 2025-3-25 14:01:46
Literature and Society: The Problem of Method,ral, and specifically English disdain for theoretical analysis. Against the background of such an intellectual climate, it appears necessary to attempt a briefjustification, at least, for beginning a study of the prose and poetical works of John Milton with a ‘theoretical’ chapter which takes as its
Aerophagia
发表于 2025-3-25 18:41:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_24.png
变色龙
发表于 2025-3-25 22:14:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_25.png
刚毅
发表于 2025-3-26 01:09:45
Reason Triumphant,ed, firstly, with the works of the pre-Restoration period, which express the world vision of an emergent triumphant rationalism, and secondly, with the works written under the Restoration, which express the world vision of reason embattled. Alternative schema are, of course, available.
的事物
发表于 2025-3-26 07:50:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_27.png
needle
发表于 2025-3-26 11:11:24
,A Note on Christopher Hill’s ,s theoretically the superior of the two. I make no claim to a familiarity with the empirical details of seventeenth-century English history which could possibly equal, let alone surpass, that of Dr Hill. He brings to his work an immense erudition, acquired in the course of a lifetime’s commitment to
PURG
发表于 2025-3-26 13:04:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5012/501109/501109_29.png
魔鬼在游行
发表于 2025-3-26 17:01:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04853-3English; English literature; John Milton; literature; revolution; sociology; British and Irish Literature