陶器 发表于 2025-3-26 23:51:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_31.png

Nomadic 发表于 2025-3-27 02:33:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_32.png

天赋 发表于 2025-3-27 08:26:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_33.png

incision 发表于 2025-3-27 09:48:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_34.png

OMIT 发表于 2025-3-27 14:38:18

Utrum definitio animae sit bona qua dicitur anima est actus primus substantialis corporis physici orArguitur primo quod non, quia absolutum non definitur per relativum, eo quod terminus absolutus non includit in sua ratione aliquem respectivum; et tamen anima est quid absolutum et iste terminus anima est terminus absolutus, isti vero termini actus et potentia sunt termini relativi ad invicem, ut patet nono Metaphysicae

Basal-Ganglia 发表于 2025-3-27 18:16:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_36.png

无表情 发表于 2025-3-27 22:08:31

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_37.png

Pelago 发表于 2025-3-28 05:15:39

Should the powers of the soul be distinguished by their acts or objects?And it is argued that they should not be distinguished by their acts, because powers are principles (either active or passive) and so they are naturally prior to their acts, and things that are prior do not have their distinctness from things that are posterior.

鸵鸟 发表于 2025-3-28 07:04:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_39.png

灌输 发表于 2025-3-28 13:58:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5011/501055/501055_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De A; Gyula Klima,Peter G. Sobol,Jack Zupk