2否定
发表于 2025-3-25 04:26:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5010/500901/500901_21.png
remission
发表于 2025-3-25 08:28:50
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100794argue; dialogue; ethics; flat; humanism; imagination; Judaism; metaphor; philosophy; proposition; spirituality
原谅
发表于 2025-3-25 14:03:51
http://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/500901.jpg
Aura231
发表于 2025-3-25 19:39:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5010/500901/500901_24.png
天气
发表于 2025-3-25 22:13:52
Listening to the Anxious Atheistsn the past five years, several important books promoting atheism have been published. In this chapter, I examine four of these in detail. The purpose here is neither to refute the authors nor to critique their arguments, but to enter into a dialogue. The four books I discuss include:
Ledger
发表于 2025-3-26 03:29:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5010/500901/500901_26.png
EWE
发表于 2025-3-26 05:11:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5010/500901/500901_27.png
标准
发表于 2025-3-26 09:23:14
The Limits of Dialogue, abandoned, replaced, criticized, improved upon, and, finally, legitimated (only to begin the process once again). This process is a most fragile one and comes with no external guarantees that it will work.
Water-Brash
发表于 2025-3-26 14:24:54
of extra-logical factors on people’s thinking. Although he was motivated in this by his disagreement with Piagetian views about thinking, Wason’s work had a consequence that he could not have foreseen. By saying that thinking was NOT logical, Wason helped to shape the development of paradigms in the
影响
发表于 2025-3-26 17:38:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5010/500901/500901_30.png