佯攻
发表于 2025-3-21 16:08:35
书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Japanese and Western Phenomenology读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0500605<br><br> <br><br>
Enervate
发表于 2025-3-21 21:40:16
The Ideality of Meaning in Husserl concern. Quine’s denial of meaning may be shown to undermine the basis of his claim of a firm core of empricism. Whenever he talks about “perceptual similarity” he can not help relying upon the subjective standpoint of unifying meaning that he rejects.
expunge
发表于 2025-3-22 03:29:39
Phenomenological Self-Reflection in Husserl and Finkmained latent in Husserl. Fink tried to deepen his reflection on the meaning of the being of doing philosophy and on the self-criticism of phenomenology. The question turned out for him to radicalize the dualism of transcendental life. For Husserl transcendental analysis was explication of the implications of the double temporalization.
粗俗人
发表于 2025-3-22 06:48:01
Self and Timeer, do matters really stand so? The self is not a substance categorically; nevertheless, we cannot help thinking that it exists par excellence, because all things—qua factual appearances—exist empirically only in relation to it.
Incise
发表于 2025-3-22 11:12:07
Husserl and the “Foundations of Geometry”pt of their correspondence and critical comments on it. Husserl clearly understood the point of their crucial differences and sympathized with Hilbert’s axiomatic method. But he could not rest content with Hilbert’s formalistic position later and moved to the transcendental grounding of the sciences.
狼群
发表于 2025-3-22 16:34:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5007/500605/500605_6.png
LUMEN
发表于 2025-3-22 18:39:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5007/500605/500605_7.png
熄灭
发表于 2025-3-22 23:23:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5007/500605/500605_8.png
enterprise
发表于 2025-3-23 01:49:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5007/500605/500605_9.png
Kinetic
发表于 2025-3-23 07:25:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5007/500605/500605_10.png