debouch
发表于 2025-3-25 03:41:32
Samaritan’s Dilemmas, Wealth Redistribution, and Polycentricitystandard analytical implications, we integrate three concepts that are not present in the standard analysis. These concepts are the Samaritan’s dilemma, co-production, and polycentricity. It is interaction among these three concepts that reverses the implications of the standard analysis of redistribution.
overture
发表于 2025-3-25 09:37:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5004/500392/500392_22.png
Corporeal
发表于 2025-3-25 15:27:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5004/500392/500392_23.png
符合规定
发表于 2025-3-25 17:01:55
James Buchanan and the Properly Trained Economists about Pareto improvements to be tested through democratic deliberation. These related, but distinct, roles, have a non-normative and didactic basis, which is to teach citizens of a democratic society that there are opportunities for mutual gains from trade.
Hot-Flash
发表于 2025-3-25 20:24:03
Book 2018ideas into the scholarlycommunity. Moreover, his ideas extended the domain of economic inquiry along many paths that numerous economists subsequently pursued. Buchanan’s scholarship brought economics and political science together under the rubric of public choice. He was also was a prime figure in
Asseverate
发表于 2025-3-26 03:16:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5004/500392/500392_26.png
1分开
发表于 2025-3-26 06:19:57
Richard E. Wagnery, or “focused” at this point. Proteins are therefore separated according to their charge, and not size as with SDS gel electrophoresis. In practice the protein samples are loaded onto the gel before the pH gradient is formed. When a current is applied, protein migration and pH gradient formation oc
majestic
发表于 2025-3-26 10:49:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5004/500392/500392_28.png
切碎
发表于 2025-3-26 15:51:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5004/500392/500392_29.png
Arctic
发表于 2025-3-26 19:58:57
Who Was James M. Buchanan and Why Is He Significant?, in the post-war period. Buchanan started his career in 1948 as someone who wanted to provide a different scholarly framework for a theory of public finance and managed to do so. What resulted was a scholarly output that was published in 20 volumes in 2002, to which he continued to add until his dea