Collar
发表于 2025-3-23 10:42:18
J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression978-3-319-60101-4
agonist
发表于 2025-3-23 17:23:59
Conclusion,The conclusion emphasizes that Coetzee’s oeuvre calls for a revised understanding of self-reflexivity and metalepsis, and ends on the implications of such a reconsideration for our practice as critics and readers.
sultry
发表于 2025-3-23 18:22:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5001/500008/500008_13.png
ELUC
发表于 2025-3-24 00:22:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5001/500008/500008_14.png
Perennial长期的
发表于 2025-3-24 05:48:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5001/500008/500008_15.png
LEVY
发表于 2025-3-24 08:57:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5001/500008/500008_16.png
accordance
发表于 2025-3-24 13:28:30
ld, such as Clarkson, Hayes, Attwell and Attridge.Combines tThis book is about the metanarrative and metafictional elements of J. M. Coetzee’s novels. It draws together authorship, readership, ethics, and formal analysis into one overarching argument about how narratives work the boundary between ar
Nerve-Block
发表于 2025-3-24 16:35:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/51/5001/500008/500008_18.png
圣人
发表于 2025-3-24 21:45:03
Author and Reader: Communication, Creation, and Care,er,” and ., where Mrs. Curren is a forerunner), is shown to be in a state of limbo, subject to uncertainties in writing and reading. She functions to allow Coetzee to speak without claiming authority and to extend responsibility to the reader for the challenges that surrogates and author face.
Hla461
发表于 2025-3-25 01:55:01
Book 2017l analysis into one overarching argument about how narratives work the boundary between art and life. On the basis of Coetzee’s writing, it reconsiders the concept of metalepsis, challenges common understandings of self-reflexive discourse, and invites us to rethink our practice as critics and reade