光明正大 发表于 2025-3-23 12:18:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4762/476139/476139_11.png痴呆 发表于 2025-3-23 17:27:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4762/476139/476139_12.pnginvulnerable 发表于 2025-3-23 21:04:19
Naga Bhavigna Emani,Kavya Seemala,Durga Naga Venkata Sai Madhuri Narlapati,Venkatasai Ravindra Reddys age and disability.Challenges perceptions and assessments .Ethics and Affects in the Fiction of Alice Munro. explores the representation of embodied ethics and affects in Alice Munro’s writing. The collection illustrates how Munro’s short stories powerfully intersect with important theoretical tre公理 发表于 2025-3-24 00:21:45
Shakti Gatla,Santosh Krishna B,Anitha M,Lakshmi Anusha Kothamasulumbers on the question of how animals ought to be treated. As many have said, to whom I have recommended the reading of Singer’s ., “I’d better not; I like steak too much.” It is surprising that the parallels are not recognized, e.g., an antebellum, American plantation owner saying “I’d better notGene408 发表于 2025-3-24 05:08:28
Kalpana B. Khandale,C. Namrata Mahenderaches to their topics and come to widely divergent conclusions. The goal of the volume as a whole is to shed a brighter light upon an aspect of human life-our relations with the other animals-that has recently seen a great increase in interest and in the generation of heat. The discussions and debatAGONY 发表于 2025-3-24 07:16:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4762/476139/476139_16.pngTEN 发表于 2025-3-24 14:06:51
Ashwini Dalvi,Vedashree Joshi,Ananya Warior,Divya Nair,S. G. Bhirude hold towards them, because the laws of a society are ultimately dependent on its morality. In one sense, this is very obvious. Our laws concerning prostitution, pornography, obscenity, drugs, and so forth clearly . of what the public thinks is right and wrong. That is, as these attitudes change, tEXPEL 发表于 2025-3-24 15:02:15
Anil Hingmire,Aditi Sawant,Divya Patil,Dimple Khuman,Sunayana Jadhav,Sanjay Lohar place in it. How far justice as fairness will have to be revised to fit into this larger theory it is impossible to say” (1971, p. 512). Rawls had not felt the need for a theory larger than his Kantian interpretation of fairness when, earlier, he had discussed principles of right for individuals, spacket 发表于 2025-3-24 20:37:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4762/476139/476139_19.pngSupplement 发表于 2025-3-24 23:49:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4762/476139/476139_20.png