释放
发表于 2025-3-25 06:17:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_21.png
Favorable
发表于 2025-3-25 09:03:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_22.png
粗糙滥制
发表于 2025-3-25 13:08:05
A Contingency Interpretation of Information Theory as a Bridge Between God’s Immanence and Transcendnking about God’s immanence and transcendence. We ask when it is possible to say that a consciousness has to be behind the information we encounter. If God is to be thought about as a communicator of information, we need to ask whether a communication system has to pre-exist to the divine and impose
油毡
发表于 2025-3-25 19:14:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_24.png
无目标
发表于 2025-3-25 21:57:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_25.png
贞洁
发表于 2025-3-26 03:45:10
Book 2020to move ‘beyond nature’? What might it mean to transcend nature? What reflections of anything ‘beyond nature’ might be found in nature itself? ..Gathering papers originally delivered at the 2018 annual conference of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology (ESSSAT), the book includ
露天历史剧
发表于 2025-3-26 04:52:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_27.png
Inflamed
发表于 2025-3-26 08:28:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4759/475890/475890_28.png
Mercurial
发表于 2025-3-26 16:24:07
Why I Am a Science-Inspired Naturalist But Not a Philosophical Naturalist Nor a Religious Naturalistan attractive strategy when it comes to philosophical justification of values, appreciate the motivating and identity-defining power of religious and personal narratives that integrate ethos, loves, and one’s worldview, while considering oneself agnostic on matters of ultimate explanations and values.
闪光你我
发表于 2025-3-26 17:58:41
Revisioning the Anthropocene in a Trinitarian Frame: A Theological Response to Clive Hamilton’s he rapid diffusion of the digital economy as well as in the anthropocenic modification of the earth system) poses for the taken-for-granted immanent frame itself. In response I argue that a constructive theological response to the issues Hamilton raises is to articulate an alternative ‘Trinitarian frame’ (tentatively explored by Taylor in .).